Orbit
Sample report

Sample AI Visibility Report

See the kind of evidence, competitor insights, citation analysis, readiness checks, and action roadmap included in an Orbit audit.

This is what the Growth GEO Intelligence Audit delivers. Not sure yet? Run a free preview first to check your site's AI readiness.

Sample data only. Orbit does not guarantee rankings in AI engines.

Illustrative sample data
Observed visibility
Competitor benchmark
Citation/source analysis
No ranking guarantees
How this works

Free preview vs. Growth GEO Intelligence Audit

The free preview checks your website's readiness foundations. The Growth GEO Intelligence Audit goes further and tests actual AI answer visibility.

Free preview

Deterministic website readiness check

No AI calls, no guesswork — a quick check of the technical and structural signals that determine whether AI answer engines can understand your site at all. Not a full AI prompt benchmark.

  • Technical access
  • Indexability signals
  • Structured data
  • Content clarity
  • Source readiness
Growth GEO Intelligence Audit

Tests actual AI answer visibility

The deeper, paid layer shown throughout this sample report — a defined prompt set tested across selected AI engines, generated automatically with a human QA pass before delivery.

  • Defined prompt set testing
  • Observed AI answers
  • Competitor substitution
  • Citation/source analysis
  • Automated priority roadmap, human QA pass
Facts01

What was directly observed in each engine's answer.

Signals02

Patterns extracted across the defined prompt set.

Hypotheses03

Evidence-based explanations for the signals observed.

Recommendations04

Prioritized actions tied back to the evidence above.

Every finding below maps to this facts → signals → hypotheses → recommendations structure. See the full methodology for confidence levels.

Report preview summary

What a client receives after an Orbit audit

This premium sample shows how observed answers, competitors, citations, readiness signals and next actions are organized for business decision-makers.

AI

Sample AI Visibility Report

Illustrative sample data, not client data

Sample report

Growth GEO Intelligence Audit sample

Prepared for fictional sample brand

NovaCRM

Evidence, competitor insights, citation analysis, readiness checks, and action roadmap in one decision-ready report.

Sample brand
NovaCRM
Market
B2B CRM software / United States
Audit type
Growth GEO Intelligence Audit sample
Engines observed
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews
Prompt set
48 sample prompts
Scope
Commercial, comparison, category, and branded prompts
Report type
Illustrative sample report
Confidence note
Directional analysis based on a defined prompt set

Executive summary

What the sample report reveals

NovaCRM appears in some branded and category prompts, but competitors are more frequently recommended in comparison and buying-intent queries.

Sample report ID: ORB-SAMPLE-0726
64/ 100Strong but fragile
Mention coverage

42%

Citation coverage

24%

Competitors ahead

3

Sources reviewed

22

Priority actions

8

Engine observations5 observed engines
ChatGPT61
Perplexity67
Gemini58
Claude64
Google AI Overviews70
Observed patterns
  • Brand visibility is strongest when prompts mention NovaCRM directly.
  • SalesPilot and PipelineIQ are recommended more often for shortlist and comparison questions.
  • Third-party review pages and category guides shape many of the observed answers.
Top opportunities
  1. 01Improve category positioning on core pages.
  2. 02Build answer-ready comparison and evaluation content.
  3. 03Strengthen review, directory, and industry guide coverage.
Shared report components

Sample report - illustrative data only

This public sample now uses the same structured report model and shared components as private project audit reports. The data below is illustrative and is not inserted into the database.

Sample report - illustrative data only

Sample AI Visibility Report

novacrm.example

64/ 100Strong but fragile

NovaCRM has clear owned-site positioning, but competitor and citation visibility is stronger in comparison-style prompts. The recommended next step is to improve answer-ready comparison evidence and third-party source consistency.

Score breakdown

brand presence

62/100

content citability

58/100

authority signals

54/100

technical accessibility

82/100

ai search readiness

64/100

competitor positioning

49/100

Findings

  • mediumbrand presence

    Brand appears in branded prompts but weakens in category prompts

    The sample brand is visible when users search directly for the company, but competitor names appear more often in shortlist and comparison prompts.

    • Defined prompt sample
    • Competitor benchmark
    • Observed answer summaries
  • highcontent citability

    Owned comparison content is not yet citation-ready

    AI answers have clearer third-party and competitor sources than owned comparison pages for high-intent buyer questions.

    • Citation/source analysis
    • Owned source review
  • positivetechnical accessibility

    Technical accessibility is a relative strength

    Core pages are reachable and indexable, giving the brand a usable base for future AI visibility improvements.

    • Readiness checklist

Recommendations

  1. 1now

    Publish balanced competitor comparison pages

    Create evidence-led comparison pages for the main alternatives that appear in AI answers, including decision criteria, fit notes, and proof points.

    competitor positioning - Impact: high - Effort: medium

  2. 2next

    Strengthen third-party source consistency

    Align review profiles, directory descriptions, and industry guide copy so AI systems see a consistent category and positioning narrative.

    authority signals - Impact: medium - Effort: medium

30-day action plan

  1. 1now

    Clarify category and ICP evidence

    Update core product and category sections around the buyer questions most likely to appear in AI answer prompts.

    ai search readiness - Impact: high - Effort: medium

  2. 2next

    Add answer-ready FAQ blocks

    Add concise FAQ sections that answer comparison, pricing-fit, integration, and use-case questions directly.

    content citability - Impact: medium - Effort: low

Methodology

  • Illustrative sample data only
  • Observed visibility framing
  • Competitor benchmark model
  • Citation/source readiness review
  • No ranking guarantees
Executive summary

A concise view of what was observed

NovaCRM appears in some branded and category prompts, but competitors are more frequently recommended in comparison and buying-intent queries.

Observed patterns

Brand visibility is strongest when prompts mention NovaCRM directly.

SalesPilot and PipelineIQ are recommended more often for shortlist and comparison questions.

Third-party review pages and category guides shape many of the observed answers.

NovaCRM has clear product messaging, but weaker comparison content and uneven off-site source coverage.

Next recommended actions

Prioritize source coverage, comparison content, and clearer entity signals before rerunning the priority prompt set.

AI Visibility Scorecard

Sample indicators, not official platform metrics

Scores are proprietary decision-support indicators based on a defined prompt set and observed answers. They are not official AI platform metrics.

The scorecards help leadership see the pattern quickly. The findings, sources and roadmap explain what sits behind each sample indicator.

AI Visibility Score

64/100

Sample proprietary indicator
Brand Mention Coverage

42%

Brand present in observed answers
Competitor Pressure

High

Three competitors appear more often
Citation Strength

Needs work

Owned sources are cited unevenly
AI Readiness

58/100

Several answer-ready gaps
Prompt Coverage

48

Sample prompts in the defined set
Prompt evidence

The answer-level evidence behind the summary

Each sample prompt is tagged with its intent, engine, brand visibility, competitor presence and opportunity level.

ChatGPTCategory shortlist

Best CRM software for growing B2B sales teams

Brand: PartialCompetitor: YesHigh opportunity
PerplexityComparison

NovaCRM vs SalesPilot for pipeline management

Brand: YesCompetitor: YesMedium opportunity
GeminiBuying-intent recommendation

Which CRM tools are recommended for account-based sales?

Brand: NoCompetitor: YesHigh opportunity
ClaudeBrand trust

Is NovaCRM a reliable CRM for mid-market teams?

Brand: YesCompetitor: NoLow opportunity
Google AI OverviewsAlternative search

Best alternatives to legacy CRM systems

Brand: PartialCompetitor: YesHigh opportunity
Competitor Visibility Benchmark

Who gets recommended instead?

A business-friendly benchmark shows which brands appear, how often they are recommended, whether citations support them, and how AI answers frame the category.

Competitor

SalesPilot

73

sample score

Mention coverage
58%
Recommendation
High
Citation presence
Strong

Often framed as the safest shortlist option for scaling sales teams.

Sample brand

NovaCRM

64

sample score

Mention coverage
42%
Recommendation
Medium
Citation presence
Needs work

Clear when named directly, less visible in unbranded buying-intent prompts.

Competitor

PipelineIQ

69

sample score

Mention coverage
51%
Recommendation
High
Citation presence
Medium

Frequently appears in comparison answers and industry guide summaries.

Competitor

DealFlow Cloud

57

sample score

Mention coverage
32%
Recommendation
Medium
Citation presence
Medium

Appears as a niche alternative when prompts mention sales forecasting.

Want to see where competitors replace your brand?

The Growth GEO Intelligence Audit tests defined prompts, compares answer patterns, and identifies which sources shape the recommendations.

Citation & Source Analysis

Which sources shape the answers?

The report identifies owned pages, third-party reviews, media, directories, industry guides and competitor pages that appear to support observed AI answers.

Third-party review

crmreviewindex.com

14 mentions
Ownership/status
Third-party - Competitor-led
Observed in
Perplexity and Google AI Overviews

SalesPilot is referenced more often than NovaCRM in review snippets.

Recommended action

Improve profile completeness and review evidence.

Owned site

novacrm.com

8 mentions
Ownership/status
Owned - Brand present
Observed in
ChatGPT and Claude

Core pages are cited in branded prompts but not enough in category prompts.

Recommended action

Add answer-ready comparison and category sections.

Industry guide

softwareguideweekly.com

7 mentions
Ownership/status
Third-party - Competitor-led
Observed in
Perplexity

PipelineIQ appears in category guides where NovaCRM is absent.

Recommended action

Identify inclusion requirements and strengthen evidence pages.

Media

midmarkettechinsights.com

5 mentions
Ownership/status
Earned - Missing brand
Observed in
Google AI Overviews

AI answers cite industry articles that do not mention NovaCRM.

Recommended action

Build media and expert-source coverage around mid-market CRM needs.

Competitor page

salespilot.com/compare

4 mentions
Ownership/status
Competitor - Competitor-led
Observed in
ChatGPT

Competitor comparison content gives AI systems a clearer narrative.

Recommended action

Publish balanced comparison content for priority alternatives.

AI Readiness Checklist

Is the site ready to be understood by AI engines?

Readiness checks connect the report to practical website, content and source improvements.

Strong

Crawlability / indexability

Core pages are reachable and indexable.

Needs work

Structured data

Product and organization signals could be clearer.

Needs work

Entity clarity

Category, ICP, and use-case language is not always consistent.

Strong

Service/category clarity

Main CRM positioning is clear on owned pages.

Opportunity

FAQ / answer-ready content

Buyer questions are present but not structured around AI-style prompts.

Missing

Comparison content

Priority competitor and alternative pages are thin or absent.

Needs work

Source and brand consistency

Third-party descriptions vary across directories and guides.

Opportunity

Off-site signals

Review and industry-guide coverage can be strengthened.

Growth GEO Intelligence Audit

What the Growth GEO Intelligence Audit includes

This sample illustrates the structure and depth of a Growth GEO Intelligence Audit engagement. Here is what a real engagement includes.

01

Defined prompt set

A scoped set of prompts agreed before testing begins — no black box.

02

Multi-engine answer testing

Tests observed answers across selected AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini.

03

Competitor comparison

Compares which brands get recommended instead of you, and why.

04

Citation and source extraction

Identifies the domains and citations shaping AI answers in your category.

05

AI readiness observations

Connects visibility gaps to practical website and content improvements.

06

Automated priority roadmap

Prioritizes evidence-based actions, generated automatically with a human QA pass before delivery.

Related services

Explore the services behind the sample report

The sample report combines competitor, citation, and readiness analysis. These focused pages explain each service area in more detail.

AI Competitor Visibility Benchmark

Understand which competitors AI engines recommend instead of your brand and where visibility gaps appear.

AI Citation Analysis

Review the sources, citations, domains, reviews, directories, and content shaping AI-generated answers.

AI Readiness Audit

Check whether your website, entity signals, schema, content, and source footprint are clear enough for AI systems.

Priority Action Roadmap

From diagnosis to prioritized next actions

The roadmap turns observed visibility gaps into clear actions with impact, effort, priority and related page or service area.

Priority 1
Impact: HighEffort: Medium

Rewrite core CRM category sections around high-intent buyer questions.

AI answers need clear evidence of who the product serves and when it is relevant.

Priority

Immediate

Related area

Website category pages

Priority 2
Impact: HighEffort: Medium

Create balanced comparison pages for SalesPilot, PipelineIQ, and legacy CRM alternatives.

Comparison prompts currently surface competitors more often than NovaCRM.

Priority

Immediate

Related area

Comparison content

Priority 3
Impact: MediumEffort: Medium

Improve review profiles, industry guide inclusion, and consistent brand descriptions.

Citations from third-party pages strongly influence observed recommendations.

Priority

Next

Related area

Off-site sources

Priority 4
Impact: MediumEffort: Low

Retest priority prompts after source and content updates.

A repeat run shows whether visibility patterns changed in the defined scope.

Priority

Monthly

Related area

Monitoring report

Packages

What this looks like by package

Start with a focused baseline, expand into deeper intelligence, or keep leadership updated with recurring reporting.

Starter Automated GEO Audit

Baseline visibility, competitor snapshot, citation highlights, readiness checklist.

Recommended

Growth GEO Intelligence Audit

Expanded prompt set, full competitor benchmark, citation/source analysis, action roadmap.

Monthly GEO Monitoring

Monthly rerun, trend summary, competitor/source changes, executive reporting.

Methodology

Evidence-based analysis, with clear limitations

Orbit uses defined prompt sets, observed AI answers, source and citation extraction, competitor comparison, and AI readiness checks — generated automatically by our GEO engine, with a human QA pass before delivery. AI answers vary by platform, prompt, geography and time. This sample report shows the type of analysis Orbit provides, not guaranteed outcomes.

Defined prompt sets
Observed AI answers
Source/citation extraction
Competitor comparison
AI readiness checks
Automated recommendations, human QA pass
Leadership view

What the report helps your team decide

The sample report is organized for business decisions, not technical metrics alone.

01

Which prompts matter most

02

Which competitors are recommended instead

03

Which sources shape buying-intent answers

04

Which pages need clearer evidence

05

Whether monthly monitoring is useful

06

What to prioritize next

Sample report FAQ

Questions before you request an audit

No. This page uses illustrative sample data to show the structure and depth of an Orbit report.

Disclaimer

AI Visibility and GEO analyses are based on tests performed at a specific date within a defined scope of prompts, platforms and competitors. Results may vary depending on users, contexts, models, interfaces and AI engine updates. The score is a proprietary decision-support indicator, not an official metric. Recommended actions are designed to strengthen visibility and credibility signals, without any guarantee of appearance, citation or ranking in AI-generated answers.

Ready to see your brand's AI visibility report?

Request an Orbit audit and receive a clear, evidence-based view of your mentions, competitors, citations, readiness, and next actions.

Prefer to talk first? Contact us